Concept visualization of the proposed SeizeFreeze implant, thermoelectric assembly, and localized cortical cooling

01 / Neurotechnology · Investigational concept

SeizeFreeze

A proposed closed-loop cortical-cooling device for drug-resistant focal epilepsy.

Role
Founder + device lead
State
Concept + prototype planning
Recognition
$12.5K documented awards
Period
2022–present
Development stage

Concept and prototype planning. SeizeFreeze has no demonstrated seizure suppression in patients, clinical validation, human testing, or regulatory clearance.

00 / Problem and role

A focal-cooling approach to seizure control

The concept pairs seizure sensing with controlled cooling at a focal cortical target. The aim is to suppress pathological activity without removing tissue. I developed the proposed thermoelectric architecture, modeled heat transfer and candidate materials, and explored power, packaging, and safety requirements. Competition awards were received by the Cyberpunk Reality team; the available record does not separate each collaborator’s engineering contribution.

Concept film / 02:17

Early concept film

An early pitch film describing the proposed device and its intended application.

Film context: drug-resistant focal epilepsy, the proposed closed-loop cooling concept, early device imagery, and the intended application. Audio is optional; the case study below contains the substantive engineering narrative.

Figures 1–2 / System architecture

Proposed sensing and cooling architecture

The proposed architecture links electrocorticography, temperature sensing, control logic, and localized thermoelectric cooling. The diagrams describe intended behavior; they do not show a tested closed-loop device.

Concept diagram showing a proposed SeizeFreeze implant above the cortex with sensing, thermoelectric, and cooling layers
1. Proposed implant architecture and superficial cortical interface. Open full resolution ↗
Block diagram of the proposed SeizeFreeze closed-loop sensing and cortical cooling control system
2. Conceptual event-triggered sensing and control loop. Open full resolution ↗

Figures 3–4 / Thermal model

Heat transfer and thermal modeling

A Peltier element can create a temperature gradient when current flows. Device feasibility depends on heat rejection, perfusion, tissue conduction, contact geometry, and control limits. Simulation and bench testing must resolve those variables.

Diagram of thermoelectric cooling physics with hot and cold sides of a Peltier element and the heat-removal equation
3. Simplified thermoelectric energy balance for the proposed interface. Open full resolution ↗
Conceptual cortical temperature field and bioheat-transfer equation beneath a localized cooling surface
4. Conceptual temperature field used to define candidate parameters and boundary conditions. Open full resolution ↗

Figures 5–6 / Mechanism and safeguards

Temperature limits and shutdown requirements

Cooling can alter neuronal excitability through several interacting mechanisms. A useful device would need independent temperature limits, rapid shutdown, electrophysiologic confirmation, and protection against thermal overshoot or heat accumulation.

Diagram of proposed biological effects of cortical cooling on synaptic transmission, ion channels, neurotransmitter release, and network activity
5. Proposed cooling effects; this diagram is not a SeizeFreeze experiment. Open full resolution ↗
Conceptual safety constraints and failure modes for a focal cortical cooling system
6. Draft safety framework for bench and preclinical testing. Open full resolution ↗

Figures 7–8 / Packaging

Candidate materials and implant packaging

Packaging must address hermeticity, corrosion, biocompatibility, electrical isolation, thermal efficiency, fixation, and surgical access. This stack is the starting point for design controls, materials selection, and packaging experiments.

Exploded conceptual stack showing proposed housing, electronics, thermal spreader, thermoelectric module, insulation, cold plate, interface, and sensors
7. Candidate packaging stack and material-selection criteria. Open full resolution ↗
Evidence map separating established physiology, preclinical focal-cooling evidence, and the proposed SeizeFreeze implant architecture
8. Evidence map: established physiology, preclinical cooling evidence, and the current device concept. Open full resolution ↗

05 / What the work establishes

Evidence and limitations

Design rationale

Cooling and sensing

The concept uses temperature control and electrocorticography as its proposed cooling and sensing methods.

Preclinical

Animal cooling experiment

Yang and colleagues studied focal cooling in anesthetized rats with experimentally induced neocortical seizures. This supports the cooling rationale, not SeizeFreeze’s effectiveness.

Yang et al., Epilepsia (2002) ↗
Proposed

SeizeFreeze

The implant architecture, controller, packaging stack, and operating envelope are the current design under development.

06 / Project record

Project outputs and competition awards

2023 Randall Family Big Idea Competition
Third place · $5,000
Kuzneski Innovation Cup
Winner · $7,500
Current work
Thermal models, engineering requirements, and prototype planning

Pitt’s 2023 Randall winner record ↗

Pitt’s 2022–23 report lists both competitions ↗

Watch the original founder pitchStarts at 3:09 ↗
Arjan Singh Puniani presenting an early-stage SeizeFreeze pitch
Early-stage founder pitch during the project’s competition phase.
Cyberpunk Reality team holding the Kuzneski Innovation Cup trophy with a graphic noting the seven-thousand-five-hundred-dollar award
Kuzneski Innovation Cup · $7,500 documented award.

Next experiments and unresolved requirements

Bench experiments would need to measure cooling rate, spatial heat spread, heat rejection, and shutdown behavior. Safe temperature limits, duty cycle, detection performance, and chronic tissue response remain unresolved. The design diagrams and competition awards do not establish safety or effectiveness.