ASPArjan Singh Puniani
ACADEMIC SYSTEMS STUDYRISK-MANAGEMENT ANALYSISCOURSE-USE PROPOSAL

Belmont Abbey College coursework · 2026

Belmont motorsport systems

For Belmont Abbey College coursework, I wrote a 16-item risk analysis, mitigation plan, and proposed emergency and medical operations annex for a road-racing weekend at Sonoma Raceway.

Status boundary

Coursework status

This was an academic, role-based proposal. It was not commissioned, reviewed, or approved by Sonoma Raceway, NASCAR, or a public agency.

Operational problem

Problem: coordinating event risks and response roles

The coursework treated a major road-racing weekend as a coupled operating environment: competition, medical response, public safety, crowd movement, temporary systems, restricted access, and recovery all affect one another. The work connected ranked risks to controls, responsible roles, communication, and return-to-operations gates.

System model

Proposed response sequence

  1. 01Hazard
  2. 02Trigger
  3. 03Owner
  4. 04Response
  5. 05Communication
  6. 06Recovery condition
  7. 07Record

Text equivalent: identify a hazard, define what changes its state, assign the responsible role, execute the response, close the communication loop, verify recovery conditions, and retain the decision record.

Risk register

Six risk domains in the 16-item register

The underlying coursework ranked 16 event risks with consistent likelihood and impact criteria. The table groups those risks into six domains.

Risk domainControl postureSystem connection
Heat + medical surgePreventCapacity, monitoring, escalation, recovery
High-energy crashRespondScene control, rescue interface, handoff, record
Fire + hazardous materialContainIsolation, specialist response, access control
Weather + wildfireCoordinateMonitoring, common operating picture, decision record
Security threatProtectRole separation, access, public information
Communications + utility failureContinueRedundancy, read-back, time logging

The rankings are qualitative coursework judgments; they are not current venue risk estimates.

Escalation ladder

Proposed incident classifications

01

Minor

Managed within a routine functional response, with the event recorded.

02

Serious

Requires cross-functional coordination and a shared operating picture.

03

Major

Requires broader command coordination and defers to lawful public-agency authority.

These incident levels belong to the coursework proposal.

Decision ownership

Proposed responsibilities and handoffs

RoleDecision domainHandoff artifact
Race ControlCompetition and course statusOperational decision record
Fire-rescueHazard control and rescue interfaceScene status
Medical leadershipTriage, clinical disposition, transport coordinationStructured handoff
Security + operationsAccess, perimeter, crowd and logistics continuityResource status
Public informationConsistent public messagingApproved update
Public agenciesAuthority defined by law and current plansUnified coordination

Roles proposed in the coursework.

Medical coordination

Proposed medical response and handoff sequence

  1. 01Incident recognition
  2. 02Scene stabilization
  3. 03Medical access
  4. 04Triage
  5. 05Structured handoff
  6. 06Transport decision
  7. 07Recovery + reporting
SendPlain-language message
ReceiveRead-back
ConfirmTime log + shared state

The public abstraction omits frequencies, call signs, private contacts, treatment criteria, and proposed numeric thresholds.

Recovery gates

Conditions for resuming operations

The proposal requires checks on the course, communications, medical coverage, and access before resuming operations.

  • People accounted for
  • Immediate hazard controlled
  • Course and containment checked
  • Communications restored
  • Medical/rescue coverage available
  • Access and egress usable
  • Required records preserved
  • Decision to resume documented

Operational risk lens

Limitations and operational requirements

The course work also considered tort exposure, contracts and waivers, insurance and risk transfer, documentation, staff training, compliance, continuity, and reputational consequences. The analysis is coursework, not legal advice. Operational use would require current venue and sanctioning-body procedures, EMS and hospital agreements, credentialing, communications plans, and agency review.

Sources and related work

Mechanism-to-Medical Center

The source assignments are the Sonoma Raceway risk analysis, mitigation plan, and proposed emergency and medical operations annex. They are coursework records; no current venue procedures are published here.

The separate Version 0.2 pilot card records crash mechanism, occupant protection, and neurologic observations for transfer to medical staff.

Open the neurotrauma toolkit →